Red Famine

Stalin's War on Ukraine

Anne Applebaum

26 min read
1m 20s intro

Brief summary

Red Famine reveals how Joseph Stalin and the Soviet regime deliberately engineered a catastrophic famine in the 1930s. It was not a natural disaster, but a political weapon used to break the will of the Ukrainian people and destroy their national identity.

Who it's for

This book is for anyone interested in Soviet history, the roots of the modern conflict in Ukraine, and how political ideology can be used to create mass tragedy.

Red Famine

Audio & text in the Readsome app

Introduction: The Geography and Early History of Ukraine

Taras Shevchenko, a poet born into servitude, once asked to be buried high upon a mound where he could watch the Dnieper River roar across the boundless steppes. His request captured the essence of a land defined entirely by its geography. The flat, open plains of the East European Plain offered no natural barriers against invading armies. This lack of mountains or seas meant that while a distinct culture flourished, a sovereign state remained elusive for centuries.

Ukraine existed as a colony within larger empires for most of its history. To the Russians, it was a primitive but authentic version of their own culture. To the Poles, it was a wild frontier that needed to be civilized. Both empires were drawn to the region's dark, nutrient-rich soil, which is considered the most fertile in the world. This agricultural wealth turned the territory into a valuable breadbasket, making imperial powers deeply reluctant to acknowledge a separate national identity.

Despite intense colonial pressure, a unique sense of self took root among the local population. It was forged by the Zaporozhian Cossacks, who were semi-military communities that valued autonomy and frequently led revolts against foreign masters. Leaders like Bohdan Khmelnytsky and Ivan Mazepa became enduring symbols of a desire for freedom that persisted even as the land was partitioned. This identity was deeply tied to the countryside, where the Ukrainian language remained central to daily life and oral traditions.

In the nineteenth century, this cultural spark evolved into a formal political movement. Intellectuals began using the language of the peasantry to demand social justice, education, and equality. They saw the struggle for the native language as a direct struggle for the rights of the common people. Because the movement was rooted in the rural population, it often clashed with the major cities, which served as centers of imperial control where Russian or Polish were the dominant tongues.

The Russian Empire viewed this rising national consciousness as a severe threat to its authority. Tsars banned the Ukrainian language in schools and books, dismissing it as a mere peasant dialect. They feared that a literate, educated peasantry would eventually demand political independence. In the eastern regions, rapid industrialization further pressured the area, as Russian workers flooded into factory towns, deepening the divide between urban centers and the Ukrainian-speaking countryside.

When the great empires collapsed during World War I, the dream of a sovereign nation briefly flickered to life. Though the first attempts at statehood ultimately failed, the experience permanently transformed the Ukrainian idea. What had been a loose collection of folk traditions became a concrete, modern political project. The struggle for independence in 1918 marked the true beginning of a modern nation determined to define its own destiny.

Full summary available in the Readsome app

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

About the author

Anne Applebaum

Anne Applebaum is an American-Polish journalist and historian who writes extensively on the history of communism, the rise of authoritarianism, and the development of civil society in Central and Eastern Europe. A staff writer for *The Atlantic* and a Senior Fellow at Johns Hopkins University, Applebaum won the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for her book *Gulag: A History*. She is considered an influential voice in political journalism, combining deep historical knowledge with analysis of contemporary threats to democracy.

Similar book summaries