The Blank Slate

The Modern Denial of Human Nature

Steven Pinker

22 min read
1m 21s intro

Brief summary

The Blank Slate argues that the mind is not a blank slate shaped entirely by experience, but an evolved organ with innate structures. Understanding our biological foundation provides a more realistic basis for social progress, personal responsibility, and culture.

Who it's for

This book is for anyone interested in the scientific debate between nature and nurture and its implications for politics, society, and personal identity.

The Blank Slate

Audio & text in the Readsome app

Introduction to Human Nature and Modern Myths

Every person operates with a private theory of how the mind works. These assumptions allow individuals to predict behavior, navigate social relationships, and structure society. For centuries, these theories were rooted in religious traditions, such as the Judeo-Christian belief that humans are created in a divine image, separate from animals, and possessed of an immaterial soul. In this view, the mind is a non-physical entity capable of free choice, moral reasoning, and love, existing independently of the biological body.

The dominant modern theory of the mind is the Blank Slate, a concept often linked to John Locke and his idea of the tabula rasa. Locke proposed that the human mind begins as white paper, void of any inherent characters or ideas. All knowledge, reason, and mapping of reality are inscribed upon this surface through experience. This perspective was originally a powerful tool for political liberation, suggesting that no king has a divine right to rule and no person is born innately inferior to another.

Accompanying the Blank Slate is the doctrine of the Noble Savage, popularized by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. This idea suggests that humans in their natural state are selfless and peaceful, and that social ills like violence and greed are corruptions introduced by civilization. Rousseau argued that primitive life represented the youth of the world and that modern institutions have only served to degrade the species. This stands in direct contrast to the view of Thomas Hobbes, who argued that without a strong central power to keep order, human life would be a state of constant war.

The final pillar of the modern secular faith is the Ghost in the Machine, a term coined to describe the dualism of René Descartes. Descartes argued that the mind and body are entirely different substances, with the mind lacking physical dimensions and serving as the seat of free will. This doctrine was born from a desire to protect human dignity, fearing that if the mind is just a physical mechanism, then humans are no different from clockwork or animals. This belief persists in the common intuition that there is a distinct self that owns and operates the brain.

While modern science has made it difficult for many to accept literal biblical accounts of creation, the vacuum left by religion has been filled by a secular set of beliefs based on these three concepts. These convictions govern modern intellectual life, educational policy, and social engineering. Together, the Blank Slate, the Noble Savage, and the Ghost in the Machine form a protective shield around the human experience, though they are increasingly being challenged by new scientific discoveries.

Full summary available in the Readsome app

Get it on Google PlayDownload on the App Store

About the author

Steven Pinker

Steven Pinker is a Canadian-American cognitive psychologist, psycholinguist, and public intellectual who is the Johnstone Family Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. An advocate of evolutionary psychology and the computational theory of mind, his academic specializations include visual cognition and language acquisition. He is known for his theory that language is an innate faculty of the mind that evolved as an adaptation for communication.

Similar book summaries