How We Understand the Universe Through Models

Humanity has always been driven by a deep curiosity to understand the universe and our place within it. While these questions were once the domain of philosophy, modern science has taken over the search for answers. Traditional views of the world suggest that objects follow clear paths and have definite histories that we can observe and measure. However, discoveries in the 1920s revealed that this predictable framework fails at the level of atoms, leading to the development of quantum physics.

The way we perceive the world is often compared to a goldfish looking out from a curved bowl. To the fish, the straight lines of the outside world appear curved due to the shape of the glass. While its view is distorted compared to ours, the fish could still develop consistent scientific laws to predict the movement of objects outside its bowl. This highlights a fundamental truth that there is no single, objective way to view reality that is independent of the model used to perceive it.

This concept is known as model-dependent realism. This idea suggests that our brains create mental models to make sense of the information we receive from our senses. If a model successfully predicts events, we treat it as reality. However, if two different models both agree with the data, neither can be considered more authentic than the other, and we simply choose the one that is most convenient for the specific situation.

A good scientific model must meet specific criteria to be considered useful by researchers. It should be elegant, contain few arbitrary elements, agree with all existing observations, and make detailed predictions that could potentially prove the model wrong. Elegance is highly valued because it allows a single, simple formula to explain many different cases without needing constant adjustments. This approach is essential for understanding things we cannot see directly, such as subatomic particles like electrons and quarks.

The search for a single, all-encompassing theory of everything has led to a framework called M-theory. Rather than being one single equation, M-theory is a family of overlapping theories that work together like a collection of maps representing the Earth. Each version of the theory works well within a specific range of conditions, and where they overlap, they agree on the results. This framework offers a scientific explanation for how the universe began and suggests that our universe is just one of many that arose naturally from physical laws.

Full summary available in the Readsome app

About the authors

Stephen W. Hawking

Stephen W. Hawking was an English theoretical physicist, cosmologist, and author who served as director of research at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology at the University of Cambridge. Working primarily with general relativity and quantum mechanics, he made groundbreaking contributions to the understanding of black holes and the origins of the universe. His work included the theoretical prediction that black holes emit radiation, now known as Hawking radiation, and his collaboration on gravitational singularity theorems which helped frame the Big Bang theory.

Leonard Mlodinow

Leonard Mlodinow is an American theoretical physicist and author known for his work on quantum theory and for making complex scientific topics accessible to a general audience. After a career in academia that included research at the Max Planck Institute and teaching at Caltech, he became a successful author of popular science books and a screenwriter for television series such as *Star Trek: The Next Generation*. Mlodinow has co-authored books with Stephen Hawking and has received accolades for his writing, including the PEN/E. O. Wilson Literary Science Writing Award.